Legal Opinion
Carson v. Arvantes
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1897No. 1249PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from the County Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
The right construction of the agreement which the parties made about the rent of the demised premises, and the judgment which we have formed of the legal effect of their acts at the time of the surrender, render all other matters immaterial.
Carson & Co., occupied either as owners or lessees, the premises, 820 16th street, in Denver. In 1890 by a written instrument, the terms of which need not be set out, they leased the one third front of the store to Arvantes Brothers at a monthly advance rental of $250. To secure the punctual performance of this engagement the lessees gave a mortgage for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chaude v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Rice v. DudleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Kneeland v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Talbot v. WhippleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Buffalo County Natl. Bank v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Yuen Suey v. FleshmanOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Schoen v. New Britain Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Wilson v. AgnewColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.