Legal Opinion
Schoen v. New Britain Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
¡ All of the exceptions based on the motion to correct but one, and this is of no material consequence, are defective in not stating the refusal of the court to find a material fact “which was an admitted or undisputed fact,” or in finding a material fact “without any evidence,” and they also fail to state the ground or basis of each exception except as to six paragraphs. DeFeo v. Hindinger, 98 Conn. 578, 120 Atl. 314; Morganelli v. Derby, 105 Conn. 545, 548, 135 Atl. 911. For these reasons we do not consider them.]
The plaintiffs abandoned the premises on October 20th, 1927, and the lease…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Rockwell v. Eiler's Music HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Evans v. McClureSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Wetzler v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dearborn Stove Co. v. CaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Waldschimdt v. Appleton Investment Co. (In Re Zienel Furniture, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Sline Properties, Inc. v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Thibault v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Stiles v. LambertAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.