Mims Amusement Co. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BURNETT:
This appeal raises the novel issue of whether a party has a right to a jury trial, under the state constitution, in a civil forfeiture proceeding involving an allegedly illegal video gaming machine. We certified this case for review from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, on the motion of Appellant, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). We now reverse the circuit court’s ruling that a right to a jury trial exists in such a case.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Law enforcement officials seized a Safari Skill video game belonging to Mims Amusement…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Martin v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Verenes v. AlvanosSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- State v. Greenetrack, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Henderson v. Summerville Ford-Mercury Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- In re Stephen W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.