Legal Opinion
William Warnock Co. Inc. v. H. D. Hudson Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 4, 1937No. 31,254PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Appear from the order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The court certifies the questions involved to be important and doubtful.
The Wm. Warnoek Investment Company, a corporation, now owns the shares of stock involved in the suit, having purchased them from the other plaintiff shortly before the suit was brought. The main facts alleged in the complaint are: Defendant was incorporated under the laws of this state on September 1, 1905, to “buy, sell and deal in goods, wares and merchandise of each and all kinds and to do all things necessary and convenient thereto.” The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Duluth Terminal Railway Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Smith v. Eastwood Wire Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
- Hammon v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. G. M. Gustafson Co. v. Crookston Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Drew v. Beckwith, Quinn & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Hanks v. BorelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Golconda Mining Corp. v. Hecla Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Radabaugh v. H. D. Hudson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.