Hanks v. Borelli
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
Appellee, Chief Consolidated Mining Company, was originally incorporated under the laws of the Territory of Arizona in 1909, for a period of twenty-five years. In 1912, when the Constitution of the State of Arizona became effective, cumulative voting was made mandatory. Art. 14, § 10. Corporate existence was renewed in 1934 and again in 1958, pursuant to law (now A.R.S. § 10-151).
This is a declaratory judgment action to determine whether, as a matter of law, the cumulative voting provision of the Constitution applies to elections of directors of Chief Consolidated Mining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Bohannan v. Corporation CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. Daveiss CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Dagg v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Fower v. Provo Bench Canal & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duvall v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1967
- Clark v. Airavada Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Golconda Mining Corp. v. Hecla Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Golconda Mining Corp. v. Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.