Yeldo v. MusclePharm Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Nick Yeldo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, alleges that defendant MusclePharm Corp. utilizes misleading marketing practices to promote its Glutamine product. This matter is presently before the Court on defendant's request for judicial notice, (Doc. 13) and motion to dismiss, (Doc. 12). Oral argument was held on November 14, 2017. For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
I. Background
Defendant manufactures and sells dietary supplements and sports nutrition…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aleisa v. Gojo Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Barclay v. iFit Health & Fitness Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Fishon v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Howard Goldfaden v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Oakland Tactical Supply, LLC v. Howell TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020