Legal Opinion

Fishon v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided November 20, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00816Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ARNOLD FISHON, LILLY PEREZ, and ) TANA PARKER on behalf of themselves ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 3:19-cv-00816 ) v. ) ) MARS PETCARE US, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Arnold Fishon, Lilly Perez, and Tana Parker (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a putative class, brought this action against Mars Petcare US, Inc. (“Mars” or “Defendant”) for allegedly misleading consumers by mislabeling a particular product line of dog food as grain and soy free.…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API