Fishon v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ARNOLD FISHON, LILLY PEREZ, and ) TANA PARKER on behalf of themselves ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 3:19-cv-00816 ) v. ) ) MARS PETCARE US, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Arnold Fishon, Lilly Perez, and Tana Parker (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a putative class, brought this action against Mars Petcare US, Inc. (“Mars” or “Defendant”) for allegedly misleading consumers by mislabeling a particular product line of dog food as grain and soy free.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.