Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Hangen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 26, 1943No. Docket 149/399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant invokes the auxiliary jurisdiction of this court to obtain a decree obliging the defendants to specifically perform an alleged agreement to convey to him a parcel of real estate situate on Mercer Road and Greenhouse Lane at Princeton. Basically, the cause of action must rest upon the existence of an enforceable contract, otherwise the equitable remedy cannot be operative. The relation of negotiation must be organized into that of obligation by an aggregatio mentium upon the same material and substantive matters. The bargain sought to be enforced must consist, in substance and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
  2. Tansey v. SuckoneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. Lindley v. KeimSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  4. Levine v. Lafayette Building Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  5. Stengel v. SergeantNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Talcott, Inc. v. ROTO AMERICAN CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Sutton v. LienauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. Cooper v. KensilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Sampson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API