Legal Opinion
DiCataldo v. Harold Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 1, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
15 N.J. Super. 471 (1951)
83 A.2d 545
NICHOLAS DiCATALDO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HAROLD CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, MIDRO CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DAVID CRONHEIM MORTGAGE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided October 1, 1951.
Messrs. Rothbard, Harris & Oxfeld (Mr. Emil Oxfeld appearing), attorneys for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Sandles & Sandles (Mr. Lester Sandles appearing), attorneys for defendants, Harold Corporation and Midro Corporation.
Mr. George J.H. Werner, attorney for defendant David Cronheim Mortgage Company.
STEIN, J.S.C.
Defendants,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fiedler, Inc. v. Coast Finance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Lester's Home Furnishers v. Modern Furniture Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Ridge Chevrolet-Oldsmobile v. ScaranoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Becker v. Sunrise at ElkridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Cooper v. KensilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954