Womack v. State

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was' convicted of murder and his punishment assessed at twelve years in the penitentiary: The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the conviction. Appellant complains that the court erred in overruling his motion for a continuance. This is not raised nor presented by a bill of exceptions. The question, therefore, can not be considered. See some of the cases cited in Branch’s Grim. Law, sec. 260, subdivision 3.

After the proper heading of the style of the case, etc., by one of appellant’s bills he shows that the court permitted Mattie Robinson, one of…