Bloch v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1DissentPrendergast, Judge
(dissenting). — This case was affirmed by the whole court as then constituted without any dissent, as shown by the original opinion. For the first time, in his supplemental motion for rehearing, appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to show bis guilt. In considering this question, it is important to bear in mind the charge against him. The indictment was preferred under article 13-19, P. C., which is: “If any person shall receive or conceal property which has been acquired by another in such manner as that the acquisition comes within the meaning of‘the term theft, knowing the same…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Kidwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.