Minter v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of bribery of a policeman in Dallas, Texas, and his penalty fixed at four years in the penitentiary.
Appellant has many bills of exception, and many complaints of the indictment, the charge of the court, the refusal to give his special charges and other matters. Although we have considered all of his complaints, we deem it unnecessary to take them up separately and discuss them. His attorneys have filed a forcible brief, and made an able oral argument, wherein he presents, as we take it, all the material questions necessary to a correct decision of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. SquiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Commonwealth v. MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Chitister v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Jackson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Aguero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Ex Parte PrestonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- People v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.