Burow, Jr. v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON rehearing.
April 2, 1919.
MORROW, Judge.
I am not satisfied that there are facts in this ease which would authorize the finding by the jury that appellant was a principal within the meaning of our statute, article 74 P. G. This article, in connection with others following it in the same Chapter, has been, I think, correctly construed in the leading case of Smith v. State, 21 Texas Grim. App., 107 and the cases following it including Simpson v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 389, 196 S. W. Rep., 835. There are other decisions by this court, notably Tittle v. State, 31 S. W. Rep., 677, and Dawson…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.