Legal Opinion

Burow, Jr. v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1919No. 4487Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON rehearing.

April 2, 1919.

MORROW, Judge.

I am not satisfied that there are facts in this ease which would authorize the finding by the jury that appellant was a principal within the meaning of our statute, article 74 P. G. This article, in connection with others following it in the same Chapter, has been, I think, correctly construed in the leading case of Smith v. State, 21 Texas Grim. App., 107 and the cases following it including Simpson v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 389, 196 S. W. Rep., 835. There are other decisions by this court, notably Tittle v. State, 31 S. W. Rep., 677, and Dawson…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API