Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mancino.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2018No. 2017-1079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*50 {¶ 1} Respondent, Paul Anthony Mancino Jr., of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0015576, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1963.

{¶ 2} On December 6, 2016, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed a complaint in which he alleged that Mancino violated eight professional-conduct rules by filing and prosecuting an appeal of Raymond Miller's criminal conviction and accepting compensation for that appeal from a third person-all without Miller's knowledge or consent.

{¶ 3} After conducting a hearing, a three-member panel of the Board of Professional Conduct unanimously dismissed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HeitzlerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. HardimanOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DoughertyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. DoellmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Corner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. RudduckOhio Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AveryOhio Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API