Axalta Coating Systems, LLC v. Midwest II, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
Rufe, District Judge
Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Amended Counterclaims and Strike Affirmative Defense of Plaintiff Axalta Coating Systems, LLC (Doc. No. 22). For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part,
1. BACKGROUND
A. The Agreement
This contractual dispute stems from a promising business relationship that quickly deteriorated. Plaintiff is' a corporation with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania that manufactures and sells “e-coat” automotive paint'products, which are deposited oh automotive parts using an electrical…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- BIEDA v. CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- BIEDA v. CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- C&D TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO., INC., d/b/a FACTORY MOTOR PARTSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- CITIZENS BANK, N.A. v. NASHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Clements v. Alto Trust Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.