Legal Opinion

Tracy v. City of Mt. Pleasant

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 24, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Henry District Court. — Hon. W. S. "Withrow, Judge. Action to condemn certain land to the use of Mt. Pleasant, to supply that city with water and fire protection. The city appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.

This is a proceeding to condemn certain land for the use of the city of Mt. Pleasant in supplying water and affording fire protection to its people. The application therefor alleged this to have been insufficient, and that, “in pursuance of said objects, the city of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa, through its city council, finds that it is necessary to procure or acquire, by purchase or condemnation, for the purpose of obtaining a sufficient water supply and adequate fire protection; that the said city desires to make some extensive improvements to obtain a sufficient supply of water, and also to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Mohr v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Western Securities Co. v. AtleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Randell v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API