Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Iowa State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1963No. 50981PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife who own a virtually unimproved tract of about 14% acres in the southwest part of the town of Manning. At the time of the condemnation, July 11, 1961, the south side of the tract at its west end abutted the north side of east-west highway 141 for about 162 feet. Defendant state highway commission (herein called “commission”) condemned .16 of an acre of this frontage for the purpose of widening the highway. It also condemned .13 of an acre just south of the .16. The state had an easement over the .13 but not the legal title. It was, however, included within the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Iowa Development Co. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Redfield v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Iron Workers Local No. 67 v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Linge v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Bellew v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Dolezal v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API