Legal Opinion

Stillwell Hotel Co. v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1935No. L. A. 15321PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The following statement of facts, together with the preliminary observation concerning the effect of a failure to request permission to amend, is adopted from the opinion rendered by the District Court of Appeal:

“This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent William H. Anderson, after order sustaining, without leave to amend, his demurrer on both general and special grounds to a second amended complaint against respondent and Business District Development Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the company’), wherein appellant sought to recover damages for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Baker v. Maier Zobelein BreweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Allan v. Guaranty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Klein v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beeman v. BurlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Davis v. Rite-Lite Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Caspar Lumber Co. v. StowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Higgenbotham v. TopelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API