Legal Opinion

Utah State Bar v. Summerhayes & Hayden, Public Adjusters

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1995No. 940375PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:

Defendant Summerhayes & Hayden, Public Adjusters, a Utah corporation, and individual defendants Melodie J.M. Summer-hayes and Susan L. Hayden (collectively “Summerhayes & Hayden”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Utah State Bar enjoining defendants from engaging in the practice known as third-party, adjusting. Summerhayes & Hayden contend that the trial court erred in finding that the practice' of third-party adjusting constitutes the unauthorized practice of law because the Legislature authorized the practice in title…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. . AlfaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Injured Workers Ass'n v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Linder v. Insurance Claims Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Bd. of Com'rs, Utah State Bar v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API