Legal Opinion
Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Exchange National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1967No. 9096PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
Ardmore, Oklahoma, formerly had two banks, the appellee, Exchange National Bank and Trust Company, and the First National Bank and Trust Company. The appellant, Lincoln Bank & Trust Company, was given a charter by the State of Oklahoma for the operation of a bank in Ardmore and it opened for business on November 9, 1964, in a trailer at a temporary location known as 301 West Main Street. The Exchange bank is a long established institution having its main bank which, until recently, was its only banking house, located at 15 West Main Street in Ardmore. This location is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- First Nat. Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Clement L. McEachern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Johnson v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Independent Bankers of Oregon v. CampDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1973
- American Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Lincoln Bank & Trust Company v. Exchange National Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Oklahoma Ex Rel. State Banking Board v. Bank of OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- American Fidelity Bank & Trust Company v. John G. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982