Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Yingling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8104PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

— Appellees, as owners of a mill and factory, sued appellants, as owners of another mill, for damages, on account of backing water upon their machinery. Both mills were situate on Buck Creek, about two-thirds of a mile apart, near Yorktown, in Delaware county, Indiana; appellees owning the upper mill and factory, and appellants the lower mill.

Separate demurrers were filed and overruled to the complaint. Answer in seven paragraphs filed; demurrers overruled to 2d, 3d, 4th and 5th. Reply filed in four paragraphs; demurrers overruled to the 2d, 3d and 4th. Trial by jury; answers to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Hynds v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Rowell v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Niagara Oil Co. v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API