Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. Christensen
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
The parties to this appeal are here for the second time. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. Christensen (1919), 188 Ind. 400. On the first appeal, the judgment was reversed, this court saying, p. 406: “There can be no doubt that it was the theory of the plaintiff below that the injury to the real estate was of a permanent character, affecting the value of the farm as a whole, and that the trial court adopted that theory on the trial.” Again, p. 412: “The wrongful act on which the action is based is not treated as a continuing nuisance, but a completed tortious act, resulting in permanent injury to the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Childs v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- McNulty v. Ludwig & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- State Farm v. Shuman, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Chrysler Corporation v. AlumbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Soucie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Romary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.