Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a decree - denying an injunction pendente lite for the acknowledged infringement of design patent, No. 96,768. Though the patent, which is for a woman’s purse, has never been adjudicated, the defendant must make some attack upon its validity to justify its conduct. It does; it has produced Specht’s patent, 1,022,976, and some purses manufactured in accordance with its disclosure. There are differences between these and the patented design; the tab or flap is larger in proportion to the whole purse and there is a button upon it, but if Specht’s purse were made larger,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strause Gas Iron Co. v. William M. Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Graff, Washbourne & Dunn v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Steffens v. SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- American Fabrics Co. v. Richmond Lace WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Whiting Mfg. Co. v. Alvin Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H. G. Salzman, Inc., Hutzler Mfg. Co., and C. B. Cotton & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Neufeld-Furst & Co. v. Jay-Day Frocks Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Morris White Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.