Legal Opinion
Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H. G. Salzman, Inc., Hutzler Mfg. Co., and C. B. Cotton & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 2, 1962No. 249, Docket 27191PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge.
Hygienic Specialties, Inc. (Hygienic) brought suit against H. G. Salzman, Inc. (Salzman), Hutzler Mfg. Co. (Hutzler), and C. B. Cotton & Co., Inc. (Cotton), for alleged infringement of its design patent on a soap dish and infringement of the trademark “Hygienic.” The complaint also alleged that Salzman and Hutzler had engaged in unfair competition. 1 The issues of design patent validity and infringement were submitted to a jury. It returned a verdict against Salzman and Hutzler but not against Cotton. Denying a motion by Salzman and Hutzler for judgment notwithstanding…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. J. Young Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- R. G. Smith, Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Ta'ron, Inc., and International Fragrances, Inc. v. Chanel, Inc., and Chanel Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Warner Bros. Inc. v. Gay Toys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.