Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Congressional power to authorize both patents and copyrights is contained in Article 1, § 8 of the Constitution. 1 In passing on the validity of patents, the Supreme Court recurrently insists that this constitutional provision governs. On this basis, pointing to the Supreme Court’s consequent requirement that, to be valid, a patent must disclose a high degree of uniqueness, ingenuity and inventiveness, the defendants assert, that the same requirement constitutionally governs copyrights. As several sections of the Copyright Act — e. g., those authorizing copyrights of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Eldred v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Concrete MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Classic Lawn Ornaments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.