Legal Opinion

Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 20, 1951No. 21599_1PublishedCited by 244 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Congressional power to authorize both patents and copyrights is contained in Article 1, § 8 of the Constitution. 1 In passing on the validity of patents, the Supreme Court recurrently insists that this constitutional provision governs. On this basis, pointing to the Supreme Court’s consequent requirement that, to be valid, a patent must disclose a high degree of uniqueness, ingenuity and inventiveness, the defendants assert, that the same requirement constitutionally governs copyrights. As several sections of the Copyright Act — e. g., those authorizing copyrights of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by244 opinions

  1. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Eldred v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Concrete MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Classic Lawn Ornaments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API