Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Newell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 24, 1904PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Before DantzlER, J., Anderson, October, 1903. Action by D. J. Griffith, superintendent of State penitentiary, against A. T. Newell and E. N. Geer. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Mr. Rucker cites: Defendant waived stipulation as to notice by making payments: 15 Ark., 444; 7 Ency., 123; 5 la., 336; 2 Pet;, 102. Alteration does not discharge surety: 2 Brandt of Sur. Guard., secs. 386-387; 6 Met., 186; 5 Gill v. John., 314; 5 Irish E. R., 124; Murphy on Of.

Read the full summary

Before DantzlER, J., Anderson, October, 1903. Action by D. J. Griffith, superintendent of State penitentiary, against A. T. Newell and E. N. Geer. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Mr. Rucker cites: Defendant waived stipulation as to notice by making payments: 15 Ark., 444; 7 Ency., 123; 5 la., 336; 2 Pet;, 102. Alteration does not discharge surety: 2 Brandt of Sur. Guard., secs. 386-387; 6 Met., 186; 5 Gill v. John., 314; 5 Irish E. R., 124; Murphy on Of. Bonds, sec. 757; 5 S. C., 201; 4 Mey. Fed. D., 738. Charge on facts: 26 S. C., 160; 27 S. C., 549; 28 S. C., 4; 29 S. G,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The plaintiff brought this action against defendant, Newell, as principal and defendant, Geer, as surety for breach of a bond given to secure performance of Newell’s contract with plaintiff’s successor, W. A. Neal, as superintendent of the South Carolina penitentiary, for the hire of convicts for three years, 1899, 1900, 1901. The balance claimed to be due was $169.03 for hire of fourteen convicts and salary of guard for the months of November and December, 1901. As one of their defenses, defendants alleged as a set off, damages to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kingman v. Lancashire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  2. Copeland v. Western Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  3. Carolina Grocery Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Champion v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Hyder v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. University Properties, Inc. v. MossWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hopkins v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API