Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Western Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Before Townsend, J., Sumter, October, 1894. Action by Samuel Copeland against the Western Assurance Company, commenced February, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This was an action on a policy of insurance for $1,000. The answer of defendant, among other things, interposed as a defence that the plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of that clause in the policy of insurance commonly known as the “Iron-Safe Clause.” Plaintiff offered in evidence the policy of insurance. During the introduction of plaintiff’s testimony in chief, evidence was brought out to show that the plaintiff had failed to comply with the requirements of the policy set forth in the iron-safe clause. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Piedmont & Arlington Life-Insurance v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tillis v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Pickett v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Griffith v. NewellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Broome v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API