Carolina Grocery Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Barnwell, July, 1901. Two cases by Thos. Wilson, trading under the name and style of the Carolina Grocery Co., against W. W. Moore. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: As to verification: Code, 177, 178; 28 S. C., 181; 53 S. C., 15. Plaintiff waived his-right to ask for judgment by default: Code, 276; Cir. Ct.
Read the full summary
Before Aldrich, J., Barnwell, July, 1901. Two cases by Thos. Wilson, trading under the name and style of the Carolina Grocery Co., against W. W. Moore. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: As to verification: Code, 177, 178; 28 S. C., 181; 53 S. C., 15. Plaintiff waived his-right to ask for judgment by default: Code, 276; Cir. Ct. Rules, 26; 55 S. C., 381; 48 B. C., 362; 46 S. C., 502; 42 S. C., 93; 34 S. C., 270; 23 S. C., 392. cites: As to verification: Code, 178; 28 S. C., 181; 13 Abb., 106; 14 Abb., 441; 11 How., 442; 7 How. Pr., 4; 15 How. Pr., 25352 Wait Pr., 338;…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
The two cases above named were heard together. The first named case, commenced May 4, 1901, was upon three causes of action, two of which were founded upon promissory notes and the other was upon an account for goods sold and delivered. The second named case, commenced June 1st, 1901, was upon a promissory note. The defendant’s attorney conceiving that the complaints had not been properly verified, served unverified answers, containing a general denial, but said answers were immediately returned to defendant’s attorney for want of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Griffith v. NewellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- DuPont v. Charleston Bridge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903