Legal Opinion

Ashton-Blair v. Merrill

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 28, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0235PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

Scott Ashton-Blair appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Frederick D. Merrill. We must determine whether a respondent to a bar complaint is privileged to make defamatory statements against a complainant-attorney in his response to the complaint. We hold that an absolute privilege applies to statements related to the pending proceeding and affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND 1

Ashton-Blair filed a complaint with the State Bar of Arizona against Merrill. In his response, Merrill explained and defended his conduct in his dealings with two former clients. Merrill also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Yetman v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Drummond v. StahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ledvina v. CerasaniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Goodman v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Morgan & Pottinger, Attorneys, P.S.C. v. BottsKentucky Supreme Court · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API