Ashton-Blair v. Merrill
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
Scott Ashton-Blair appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Frederick D. Merrill. We must determine whether a respondent to a bar complaint is privileged to make defamatory statements against a complainant-attorney in his response to the complaint. We hold that an absolute privilege applies to statements related to the pending proceeding and affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND 1
Ashton-Blair filed a complaint with the State Bar of Arizona against Merrill. In his response, Merrill explained and defended his conduct in his dealings with two former clients. Merrill also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Yetman v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Drummond v. StahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ledvina v. CerasaniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Goodman v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Morgan & Pottinger, Attorneys, P.S.C. v. BottsKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.