Morgan & Pottinger, Attorneys, P.S.C. v. Botts
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice CUNNINGHAM.
In these combined cases, we are asked to determine if the absolute privilege afforded statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding applies to statements contained in an attorney disciplinary complaint.
GMAC Mortgage Corporation (hereinafter “GMAC”), through its attorney, Morgan & Pottinger, Attorneys, P.S.C. (hereinafter “Morgan & Pottinger”), filed a disciplinary complaint against Appellee, Noel Mark Botts (hereinafter “Botts”). Botts had represented GMAC’s successor-in-interest in a foreclosure action. Neither the details of Botts’…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Breathitt County Board of Education v. PraterKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Bartlett v. ChristhilfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Doe v. RosenberryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- McCurdy v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Martin v. O'DanielKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Halle v. Banner Industries of N.E., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- Maggard v. KinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Hardin v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
- Arko Plumbing Corp. v. RuddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.