Burns v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiffs (Appellants) appeal from the dismissal of their defamation complaint. The trial court found that the statements at issue were made by witnesses and an attorney at a board of adjustment meeting and as such were within a quasi-judicial proceeding; therefore, the trial court held the statements were absolutely privileged. Although presented with a very brief record, we have reviewed its contents carefully and our conclusions are as follows: 1) a qualified privilege existed for the statements made at the meeting, and 2) the dismissal of the action as a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Yetman v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Chamberlain v. MathisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Supry v. BolducSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mark K. Patton, M.D., a Single Man v. Lynn Jacob Cox, Wife, and as Independent of the Last Will of Michael D. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. KitchukovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.