Legal Opinion

Burns v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 10, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0422PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs (Appellants) appeal from the dismissal of their defamation complaint. The trial court found that the statements at issue were made by witnesses and an attorney at a board of adjustment meeting and as such were within a quasi-judicial proceeding; therefore, the trial court held the statements were absolutely privileged. Although presented with a very brief record, we have reviewed its contents carefully and our conclusions are as follows: 1) a qualified privilege existed for the statements made at the meeting, and 2) the dismissal of the action as a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Yetman v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chamberlain v. MathisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Supry v. BolducSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mark K. Patton, M.D., a Single Man v. Lynn Jacob Cox, Wife, and as Independent of the Last Will of Michael D. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. KitchukovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API