Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Worten

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1933No. 24681Published

1DissentSwindall, J.

Owing to (ho fact that I am unable to harmonize the views expressed in the majority opinion in this ease with the views expressed by the majority in the case of State ex rel. Roth, Trustee, v. Waterfield, Court Clerk, No. 24650. 167 Okla. 209, 28 P. (2d) 24, and in addition to the views expressed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Osborn, in which I concur, I feel it my duty to discuss certain issues which I do not feel are fully covered in the dissenting opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Osborn.

The first paragraph of the syllabus in this case declares the rule of law to be that:

“The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Roth v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API