Legal Opinion

State v. Huffman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2007No. 33015PublishedCited by 302 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Fred K. Huffman seeks review from a Court of Appeals opinion affirming a district court decision denying Huffman’s Rule 35 motion for reduction of his sentence. We affirm his sentences.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

While on parole from 1997 robbery and grand theft convictions, Huffman absconded. He then attempted to rob one bank in Twin Falls and successfully robbed another before leaving Idaho for Nevada. Huffman was charged with burglary, I.C. § 18-1401, and grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403, 18-2407. He pled guilty to these charges, and on November 8, 2004, the district…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. KnightonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. AllbeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. StrandIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by302 opinions

  1. State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. FarwellIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. ArthurIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. GillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

297 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API