Legal Opinion
State v. Arthur
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 2008No. 34172PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
William Arthur appealed the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and the district court’s order granting his Rule 35, Idaho Criminal Rules, motion for reduction of sentence. The Idaho Court of Appeals affirmed both decisions, and this Court granted Arthur’s petition for review. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
While living as a guest in his aunt and uncle’s home, Arthur was arrested for stealing jewelry from them. The State charged Arthur with grand theft, I.C. § 18-2403, 18-2407; burglary, I.C. § 18-1401; and resisting and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Abelardo Dominguez GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. StoneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Shane Crawford v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.