Legal Opinion

State v. Farwell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2007No. 33701PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case asks this Court to decide whether the two components of a sentence enhanced pursuant to I.C. § 19-2520 must be separately articulated in order to be capable of review and whether the sentence imposed on Douglas M. Farwell is excessive. We affirm Farwell’s sentence and the district court’s denial of Farwell’s Rule 35 motion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Douglas M. Farwell was charged with two counts of aggravated assault with a sentencing enhancement for use of a firearm on each count. Those charges stemmed from a report that Farwell drove up to the front of a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HuffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. KnightonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BurnightIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CrossIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. GerardoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. ArthurIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API