Legal Opinion

Eckerle v. Ferris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1935No. 26692PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

For the purpose of this appeal the facts in material substance are as follows: Plaintiffs are taxpayers of Oklahoma county, and the defendants are members of, and constitute the State Highway Commission.

The defendants advertised for bids on 19 miles of highway construction, being five federal aid roadway construction projects, and one federal aid roadway and bridge construction project situate in three counties of the state.

The plans and specifications provided for the construction of grade and drainage and the construction of permanent rock or gravel base for the highway; for the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Harlem Gas Co. v. . Mayor, C., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Matter of Petition of Anthony DugroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. BurgessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Gilmore v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Barnard v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API