Smith v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This appeal involves the question as to whether a call for bids, limited to a patented article or one which for some reason can only be obtained from one ultimate source, is valid, under the Seattle city charter, Art. VIII, § 14, providing:
“All public improvements to be made or supplies to be purchased by contract shall be let to the lowest bidder therefor; . . .”
In February, 1936, the city published a call for bids for the furnishing of its incandescent lamp requirements for the ensuing year. The only specifications were contained in the call and required that bids should be submitted for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Dean v. CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Woods v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- State Ex Rel. City of Stamford v. Board of Purchase & SuppliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- City of Springfield v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Cosentino v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1971