Armstrong v. Payne
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is an action by riparian owners along Fitzhugh Creek, in Modoc County, to quiet their title to all the waters of Fitzhugh Creek and enjoin the defendants from interference therewith. The defendants rely upon an appropriation of 200 inches made in 1886 and one of 50 inches made by defendant Gertrude French in September 1912, and upon adverse use of the waters of said stream from 1886 and 1912, respectively. The trial court found that there was no prescriptive right in the defendants in and to any portion of the waters of Fitzhugh Creek and adjudged that all the waters of said creek…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Davis v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Hubbard v. CurtissAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Big Rock Mutual Water Co. v. Valyermo Ranch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.