Legal Opinion

Thorpe v. King

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1966No. 30,899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, C. J.

There being only four judges as members of this Supreme Court at the present time since the recent resignation of Achor, J., Myers and Rakestraw, JJ. are of the opinion that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed, while Arterburn, C. J. and Jackson, J. are of the opinion that the decision of the trial court should be reversed and the appellant granted a new trial.

The four judges participating being equally divided at the last term of court (Achor, J. not then participating), and being still equally divided at this term, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed without costs.

Acts…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Myers; Concurrence · Jackson.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Johnson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thorpe v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API