Legal Opinion

Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy District

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1958No. 29,624PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*508Arterburn, J.

This appeal is brought to determine the constitutionality of the Conservancy Act of Indiana. [Acts 1957, ch. 308, p. 851, being §§27-1501— 27-1599, Burns’ 1957 Cum. Supp.] Briefly, this Act authorizes the creation of conservancy districts for the purpose of controlling stream pollution, drainage, irrigation, water supply and other natural resources. It creates a board of directors and permits the levying of a tax and assessment for the benefits and improvements to the real estate within the district.

We are indebted to the Attorney General for briefs as amicus curiae. He has…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington Rail Road v. GeigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dortch v. LugarIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lake Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mann v. CITY OF TERRE HAUTEIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Welsh, Governor v. SellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API