Legal Opinion
Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. Glenn
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1914No. Civ. No. 1210PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was to condemn a right of way one hundred feet wide and comprising altogether 12.13 acres of land. The jury found that the value of the said strip was the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars per acre at the time of the issuance of the summons, or a total of $3,032.50; that the damages to the larger tract of which said strip formed a part by reason of its severance and the construction of the railroad was the sum of forty-one thousand four hundred dollars; and that the cost of the necessary fences would be the sum of one thousand nine hundred dollars, making a total award of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Blunck v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Brown v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by8 opinions
- Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- City of Los Angeles v. FrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Rich v. SweetIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Simpson v. New York Hardware Trading Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.