Legal Opinion

Blunck v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Wm. HuTcniNSON, Judge. Suit at law to recover damages for flooding -farm lands. The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The opinion on the original submission of this case will be found in 115 N. W. 1013. . A rehearing was granted because of our conviction that a wrong conclusion was reached in the fourth division of the opinion filed, and this opinion will discuss that feature of the case only. On all other matters the opinion of our lamented Brother Bishop is adopted and incorporated herein in his own language, except as to a few minor matters -of detail. Plaintiff claims that during the year 1903 he was the lessee in possession of the Barlow lands lying in townships 46 and 47, range 88. Respecting the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. McMahon v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Walker v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Sullens v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Drake v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eppling v. SeuntjensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. City of Los Angeles v. FrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Tretter v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Jefferis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API