Legal Opinion
Lutkewitte, Janet v. Gonzales, Alberto
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 3, 2006No. 04-5058PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*250Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
Opinion concurring in the Judgment filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.
2Per curiam
This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was briefed and argued by counsel. It is hereby Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Throughout 1999, appellant, Ms. Janet Lutkewitte, who is employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), was sexually harassed by her supervisor, David Ehemann. During this period, Ehemann engaged in repugnant and reprehensible conduct by harassing Ms.…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- Laura Phelan v. Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Nichols v. TruscottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Loni Czekalski v. Raymond LaHoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.