Legal Opinion

Flamingo v. City of Waukesha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1952PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

It is well settled that the maintenance of streets and highways in a condition fit for travel is a governmental function. Bruhnke v. La Crosse (1914), 155 Wis. 485, 144 N. W. 1100; Stoehr v. Red Springs (1928), 195 Wis. 399, 216 N. W. 487, 219 N. W. 98; Larsen v. Kewaunee County (1932), 209 Wis. 204, 244 N. W. 578. It is also a governmental function for a city to maintain a dump for the disposal of unwanted material.

“While diversity of judicial views still prevails, late cases generally hold, with some exceptions, that the functions of cleaning of streets, the collection of garbage, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Folk v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Britten v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bruhnke v. City of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bruce ex rel. Bruce v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Erickson v. Village of West SalemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Laffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Myers v. City of PalmyraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Sanem v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API