Legal Opinion
Dodson v. Ford Motor Company, 96-1331 (2006)
Superior Court of Rhode Island
Decided August 17, 2006No. C.A. No. PC 96-1331Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION RE: EXPERT WITNESSES/SPOLIATION/BURN TEST
Before this Court are six motions in limine regarding the admissibility of expert opinion testimony in the underlying products liability action, four filed by the defendant, Ford Motor Company ("Ford"), and two filed by the plaintiff, Carol Dodson ("Dodson"), in her capacity as executrix of the estates of the late Cecil and Doris Dodson ("the Dodsons"). Ford, by its motions, seeks an order entirely excluding the proposed testimony of Dodson's three expert witnesses. Dodson, by her motions, seeks an order excluding portions of the proposed…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Teresa Ambrosini v. Jorge Labarraque and the Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- State v. StreichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.