Petersen v. Cache County Drainage Dist. No. 5.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtElias Hansen, J.
The plaintiff secured a judgment against the defendant for the sum of $2,510. Of the judgment so secured, $1,800 is based upon the finding of the jury impaneled that plaintiff’s premises were damaged in that amount on account of the defendant constructing a drainage canal near and running parallel with the east boundary of plaintiff's land. The sum of $350 of the judgment is for injury to the crops grown on plaintiff’s land during the year 1926. The sum of $360 of the judgment is for injury to the crops grown upon plaintiff’s land during the year 1927. The amount awarded by the jury to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Forbell v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Southern Pac. R.R. v. DufourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Utah Copper Co. v. Stephen Hayes Estate, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- Thompson v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Tanner v. Bacon, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935