S & Q Construction Co. v. Palma Ceia Development Organization

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants denying damages for an alleged breach of contract.

Questions Presented

1. Does the fact that Palma Ceia was an unlicensed contractor compel judgment in plaintiff’s favor?

2. Does the evidence support the court’s findings (a) that defendants did not breach the contract, (b) that plaintiff did?

3. Were the findings unsupported, contradictory, and did they fail to cover the issues ?

Record

The controversy arises out of a contract entered into August 21, 1954, between plaintiff as subcontractor and defendant Palma Ceia as general contractor for…