Legal Opinion
Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 4, 2007No. 2006-1472PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware determined that Defendants-Ap-pellees Syngenta Seeds, Inc.; Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc.; Garst Seeds Company; Golden Harvest Seeds, Inc.; Garwood Seed Co.; Golden Seed Co., LLC; Sokmer Bros. Seed Company; Thorp Seed Co. and JC Robinson Seeds, Inc., (collectively “Syngenta”), did not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patents Nos. 5,538,880 and 6,013,863 (“the Lundquist patents”). Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc., 431 F.Supp.2d 482, 487 (D.Del.2006). The trial court also held claims…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Jay Franco & Sons, Inc. v. FranekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- EMC Corp. v. Pure Storage, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- SRI International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.