Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. Terpstra
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Parking on sidewalk as negligence
The trial judge properly concluded that he erred in submitting to the jury question 2 (a) inquiring whether the defendant was negligent in parking on the sidewalk in violation of sec. 346.52 (1) (d), Stats. In his memorandum decision, the trial judge stated:
“. . . that Sec. 346.52 (1) (d) is intended for the protection and convenience of users of the sidewalk and not to furnish a point for an inefficient [the trial judge having previously noted that no effective observation could be made from a point on the sidewalk] observation. The plaintiff is not within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Szafranski v. RadetzkyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Meihost v. MeihostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Kalkopf v. Donald Sales & Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by14 opinions
- Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Peeples v. SargentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Schmidt v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Kemp v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Burke v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.