Legal Opinion

Peeples v. Sargent

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1977No. 75-152PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, C. J.

The issues deal primarily with the sufficiency of the evidence as to the individual defend ants, errors as to the exclusion and admission of evidence, abuses of trial court discretion, improper jury instructions and excessiveness of damages.

The plaintiff-respondent, Richard D. Peeples, was a practicing architect in Appleton, Wisconsin. In late 1969 he experienced a dull pain in his right shoulder. Although the arm hurt when he moved it, he had no restriction of movement. In January of 1970, his personal physician referred him to Dr. James M. Sargent, one of the defendants-appellants. Calcium…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Scaria v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Terpstra v. Soiltest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. White v. LunderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Gutter v. SeamandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API